Showing posts with label modular. Show all posts
Showing posts with label modular. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

The Modular and the Cabanon

Le Corbusier's Drawing of The Modular Man (1)

Based on the measurements of an individual man, Corbusier’s Modular is a scale of proportionality. In his Modular 2, Corbusier includes a quote from M. Gabriel Dessus: “I have just read ‘The Modular’... since the purpose of architecture is to house human beings, it is necessary that the dimensions of the elements of constructions, meant to be seen at the same time as the human being, should be in a relationship with it that is aesthetically correct’ – in other words, the series chosen must contain the principal dimensions of an ‘average’ man.” Corbusier took inspiration from studies by Leonardo da Vinci and Vitruvius in establishing his own “average” man. Combining this with the Golden Ratio and the Fibonacci sequence, he relates the proportions of a building to the human functioning inside it.


The Modular man is represented on paper as a figure 2.2 m in height with one arm upraised, put inside two 1.1 by 1.1 m squares, superimposed on each other. A third square is set astride the first two, creating a place for the right angle which should help determine where to put the square. The Modular man adorns many of Corbusier’s buildings as a “signature” of sorts, and the large upraised hand becomes a recurring motif in sketches and designs like his Chandigarh open hand sculpture.


The Cabanon corresponds to Corbusier’s writings about the Modular in several ways. Firstly, he talks of the use and application of the Modulor to architecture in regards to cells, either single or in combination to form apartments or small houses. Corbusier was also fascinated with packaging and containers. The state of modern living was sad to him: “we live in an era of solidarity, not yet, alas, solidarity of feeling but of the bare bones of economic and technical method”. The idea he derived from such inspiration was two-tiered. In the first, focusing on packaging itself, Corbusier saw that optimizing the exterior, rather than the interior, would be of primary importance. This was his system of ‘isotropic’ stowage. For the second part, Corbusier focused on units of living as contained compartments. In Modular 2, Corbusier describes his Cabanon as the basic, ideal unit for such living: “Thanks to the Modular, the venture was completely sure”. Using prefabricated components assembled quickly on site and proportioned to a certain system, the Cabanon was the perfect example of one Modular unit, which later would be joined with others to make a collection in the Unité d’Habitation of Marseilles.

-Rachel Cohen Murison and Lauren Tom

Image Sources:

1. "Le Corbusier: Le Cabanon 1887-1865." http://www.borxu.com/corbu/html/modular.html (accessed Jan 16, 2010)

Information Sources:

"Iconeye." http://www.iconeye.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3684:le-corbusiers-cabanon (accessed Jan 16, 2010).

"Le Corbusier's Cabanon on the French Riviera." http://trifter.com/europe/france/le-corbusiers-cabanon-on-the-french-riviera/ (accessed Jan 16, 2010).

Le Corbusier. Le Modular and other buildings and projects, 1944-1945. New York: Garland, 1983.

Le Corbusier. My work. Translated by James Palmes. Introduction by Maurice Jardot. London: Architectural Press, 1960.

Le Corbusier. The Modulor: a harmonious measure to the human scale universally applicable to architecture and mechanics. Translated by Peter de Francia and Anna Bostock. London: Faber and Faber, 1961.

Le Corbusier. Modulor I and II. Translated by Peter de Francia and Anna Bostock. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980.


Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Classical and Modular Proportions


Classical proportions are based on the divine. Humans should strive to change for perfection.


The Modular is based on the average man. Its about how things should change to facilitate man. Its all about accessibility.


The Modular Man on the exterior of Le Corbusier's apartment block in Berlin (1)



These two "rules" contrast in hierarchy-are we above or below the rule?

Perhaps this can be used to analyze the interpretation of well-being.

Is well-being a concept of trying to copy the life of gods or is it reshaping the world to accommodate us?

I think its a contrast in the significance and authority of man.



In the 8th century society life revolved around religion. How one lead their whole life determined the state of their afterlife.

The mindset of people concerned how they would earn their right in heaven. The ideal life was not on earth.


The 1960's was a period of defining identity and change to better present life.

It was all about defining society: who was included, what rights did they have and what do they need. There was a mindset of change whether it be improving social or physical comfort. The ideal life should be tailored to meet our needs.


-Natalie Hui


Image Sources:


1. "Berlin: Corbusier's le Modular." http://www.flickr.com/photos/peterdenton/3710273131/ (accessed Jan 10, 2010).


Information Sources:


Parveen, Nikhat. "Golden Ratio in Art and Architecture." http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/ EMAT6680/Parveen/GR_in_art.htm (accessed 11 January 2010).